Is it the brand’s financial performance; its health; its “value”; its consumer perception; all or none of the above?
If you don’t have a straight answer to this question, you’re not alone.
Cognosis has conducted an independent piece of research asking a range of industry professionals which definition, from a selection of four taken from leading experts in the field, best matched their own interpretation of the term brand equity.
Please see full article for definitions |
|
There was some overlap between the definitions, but each one contained a distinct concept within it. For example, while Yoo and Donthu speak in terms of the “incremental value” of a product within the market, Lassar’s definition of brand equity centres more on consumer confidence as against its competitors. Similarly, while Keller focuses his definition on the customer, Aaker prefers to use the implements designed to create customer confidence in his definition.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the results showed an even spread amongst respondents. Professionals differ widely in their answer to this common question and academics remain at loggerheads.
However, in increasingly straitened economic times, marketers have come under ever growing pressure to justify their budgets. |
|
Marketing measurement has become a hot topic. The question of brand equity and how to measure it has never been more pertinent to marketers, and a precise answer never in greater demand.
The good news is that while we may yet not be able to agree on the precise definition of the term, creating an actionable equity dashboard to track your brand doesn’t have to be a complex exercise. Take the time to identify the right metrics for your brand, commit to monitoring them consistently, and the results are well worth the effort!
Click here to read the Cognosis’ ’10 golden rules for dashboard development’ |